Pin it
August 28, 2014 | Last Updated 10:48 AM
Loading
Image Loading

Subscribe to newsletters

 
 
MOBILE RSS twitter facebook
Entertainment
Dec 21 2012 12:00PM
 
Kim Kardashian threatens to shut down?
Kim Kardashian. Picture: AFP
print
divider
mail
divider
Bookmarkl and ShareShare
divider
share
 
Rate This Story close
|

TNA Reporter and AFP

Reality TV star and most followed user on photo sharing site Instagram, Kim Kardashian, wants the company to revise their new policy or she 'walks'.

According to TMZ, the 'Keeping up with the Kardashian's' star was not impressed by Instagram's recent terms of service policy, which allows the company to sell photographs being shared on the site to other companies without compensating the owner.

Kardashian, who has 5,726,343 Instagram followers threatened to shut down her account and take all her followers with her.

Some of those followers include her family members Kylie and Kendall Jenner, Rob Kardashian who are also all on the list of Top 10 most followed users. Her sister Khloe Kardashian-Odom also tweeted:

Hip Hop mogul Russell Simmons also rallied behind the star, commending her ability to stand up for what she believes in.

"She might have singlehandedly saved all of us from a very bad policy introduced this week by Instagram," Simmons wrote in a blog published on Global Grind.

"If she can make a billion dollar company jump out of their seat, imagine what more good she can do to change the world. Bottom line is, if Kim Kardashian wants to rally, people will join her every time!" He wrote.

Instagram however, denied on Thursday denied they would be selling users photographs.

"I want to be really clear: Instagram has no intention of selling your photos, and we never did. We don't own your photos, you do," Instagram co-founder and chief Kevin Systrom said in a blog post.

"The concerns we heard about from you the most focused on advertising, and what our changes might mean for you and your photos," "There was confusion and real concern about what our possible advertising products could look like and how they would work," he continued.

Protests prompted Instagram to stick with wording in its original terms of service and privacy policies regarding advertising and to do away with some changes that were to take effect in January, according to Systrom.

Changes to the Instagram privacy policy and terms of service had included wording that appeared to allow people's pictures to be used by advertisers at Instagram or Facebook worldwide, royalty-free.





 

|
print
divider
mail
divider
Bookmarkl and ShareShare
divider
share
 
 
Comment Now






 

 




Related Stories
Facebook vs Twitter: Facebook's Instagram pulls out support for Twitter cards
arrowIn the latest turn of the ongoing feud between Instagram and Twitter, Instagram has decided to shut off integration with Twitter's photo-posting
Twitter starts its own photo filter app
arrowTwitter has introduced its own photo-sharing application on the infamous social network after its recent feud with Facebook’s newly bought Instag
Instagram says it has right to sell your photos
arrowIn a move that no one could have predicted, the leading smartphone photo-sharing site Instagram has announced that it has the right to sell users
Instagram yields to user outrage over policy change
arrowInstagram backed down on Tuesday from a planned policy change that appeared to clear the way for the mobile photo sharing service to sell picture

 




 
 
Close

Name:*   

Email:*   

Comment: *


 
Close Name:

Email:  

Subject:

Description:
               

 
 
http://www.dmma.co.za/ sudoku